Suing for Medical Malpractice in Public vs. Private Hospitals in Florida

Medical malpractice is a significant concern for patients and healthcare providers alike. In Florida, the process of suing for medical malpractice varies considerably between public and private hospitals. These differences arise from distinct legal frameworks, procedural requirements, and protections afforded to the hospitals. This article aims to explore the key differences in legal challenges faced by plaintiffs when pursuing medical malpractice claims against public versus private hospitals in Florida.

Legal Framework Governing Medical Malpractice in Public Hospitals

Public hospitals in Florida are generally funded and operated by government entities. This status affords them certain legal protections and immunities that can complicate medical malpractice claims.

Sovereign Immunity

Under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, public hospitals and their employees are often shielded from lawsuits unless specific conditions are met. In Florida, sovereign immunity limits the liability of public hospitals to $200,000 per claim and $300,000 per incident, regardless of the number of claimants.

Notice of Claim

To sue a public hospital, a plaintiff must first file a notice of claim with the hospital’s governing body. This notice must be filed within three years of the date of the incident. After filing the notice, the plaintiff must wait for a response from the hospital, which has six months to investigate and either accept or deny the claim. If the claim is denied or no response is received, the plaintiff can then file a lawsuit in court.

Employee Immunity

Public hospital employees, including doctors and nurses, are typically considered government employees and are therefore individually immune from personal liability for actions within the scope of their employment. This immunity can be waived if the employee acted in bad faith, with malicious intent, or in a manner that exhibited a reckless disregard for the safety of others.

Legal Framework Governing Medical Malpractice in Private Hospitals

Private hospitals in Florida operate without the protections of sovereign immunity, making them more vulnerable to medical malpractice lawsuits. Plaintiffs suing private hospitals must adhere to the standard medical malpractice procedural requirements, which include the pre-suit investigation process.

Pre-suit Investigation

Before filing a lawsuit, a plaintiff must conduct a pre-suit investigation to determine if there are reasonable grounds to believe that medical malpractice occurred. This process involves obtaining a verified written medical expert opinion corroborating that the defendant’s actions fell below the accepted standard of care and caused harm to the patient.

Notice of Intent

Once the expert opinion is obtained, the plaintiff must provide the defendant with a notice of intent to initiate litigation, along with the expert’s affidavit. The defendant then has 90 days to conduct its own investigation and respond to the notice. During this period, both parties are required to engage in informal discovery, which includes the exchange of relevant medical records and other pertinent information.

Filing a Lawsuit

At the end of the 90 days, the defendant can either reject the claim, make a settlement offer, or request arbitration. If the claim is rejected or no resolution is reached, the plaintiff can proceed with filing a lawsuit in court. Unlike public hospitals, private hospitals and their employees do not have liability caps imposed by sovereign immunity, allowing for potentially higher damage awards.

Key Differences in Legal Procedures and Protections

The primary differences between suing public and private hospitals in Florida revolve around procedural requirements and liability protections. Public hospitals benefit from sovereign immunity, which caps damages and provides additional procedural hurdles for plaintiffs. These hurdles include the necessity of filing a notice of claim and waiting for the hospital’s response before proceeding with a lawsuit.

Lack of Immunity in Private Hospitals

In contrast, private hospitals do not have these immunities and are subject to the standard medical malpractice litigation process. This lack of protection means private hospitals are more exposed to litigation risks and potentially higher damage awards.

Liability of Healthcare Providers

Another significant difference is the liability of individual healthcare providers. In public hospitals, employees are generally immune from personal liability unless their actions were particularly egregious. In private hospitals, however, individual healthcare providers can be held personally liable for malpractice, increasing the potential avenues for recovery for plaintiffs.

Case Studies: Examples of Public vs. Private Hospital Malpractice Cases

To illustrate the differences in legal challenges, consider the following hypothetical case studies:

Case Study 1: Public Hospital Malpractice

A patient undergoes surgery at a public hospital and suffers complications due to the surgeon’s negligence. The patient files a notice of claim with the hospital’s governing body, which investigates the claim and denies liability after six months. The patient then files a lawsuit, but the damages are capped at $200,000 due to sovereign immunity. The surgeon, as a government employee, is immune from personal liability unless the patient can prove malicious intent or reckless disregard for safety.

Case Study 2: Private Hospital Malpractice

A patient receives treatment at a private hospital and experiences adverse effects from a medication error. The patient conducts a pre-suit investigation and obtains a medical expert’s affidavit supporting the malpractice claim. After sending a notice of intent to litigate, the private hospital investigates and rejects the claim after 90 days. The patient files a lawsuit, and the court awards significant damages based on the extent of harm and negligence. The hospital and the responsible healthcare provider are both liable for the damages.

These case studies highlight the procedural complexities and varying outcomes plaintiffs may encounter when pursuing medical malpractice claims in Florida’s public and private hospitals.

About Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa

At Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa, we specialize in handling complex medical malpractice cases across Florida. Our experienced team of attorneys is dedicated to providing personalized legal representation to clients who have suffered due to medical negligence. Whether dealing with public or private hospitals, we understand the intricacies of the legal frameworks and procedural requirements unique to each case.

Why Choose Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa?

• Expertise in Medical Malpractice: With years of experience, our attorneys possess a deep understanding of medical malpractice laws and the nuances between public and private hospital claims.
• Personalized Legal Strategy: We tailor our approach to meet the specific needs of each client, ensuring that every case receives the attention and expertise it deserves.
• Proven Track Record: Our firm has a history of successfully securing favorable outcomes for clients, including significant settlements and verdicts.
• Compassionate Support: We are committed to guiding our clients through every step of the legal process with compassion and professionalism.

If you or a loved one has been a victim of medical malpractice, contact Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa today for a free consultation. Let us help you navigate the legal challenges and pursue the justice and compensation you deserve.

Contact Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa Today

Suing for medical malpractice in Florida presents distinct challenges depending on whether the hospital is public or private. Public hospitals benefit from sovereign immunity, which imposes procedural barriers and caps on damages, while private hospitals face the standard litigation process and greater exposure to liability. Understanding these differences is crucial for plaintiffs seeking justice and compensation for medical negligence. Legal guidance from experienced attorneys, such as those at Rafferty Domnick Cunningham & Yaffa, is essential to navigate these complexities and achieve the best possible outcomes.  Reach out to us at 561-516-5168 or book a consultation online to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can assist you.